Rocky Topics: Has Geno Auriemma overtaken Pat Summitt?
On this week’s Rocky Topics, assistant sports editors David Bradford and Nathan Odom debate whether Geno Auriemma has overtaken Pat Summitt as the greatest coach in the history of women’s college basketball.
Co-written by Nathan Odom
On this week’s Rocky Topics, assistant sports editors David Bradford and Nathan Odom debate whether Geno Auriemma has overtaken Pat Summitt as the greatest coach in the history of women’s college basketball.
Bradford: Auriemma passed Summitt as the greatest coach in women’s college basketball history well before UConn’s 82-51 win over Syracuse on Sunday night. Summitt does deserve credit as a coaching pioneer for women’s basketball, but Auriemma has perfected the formula. Not only does he grab the top recruits, but his coaching brings the absolute best out of every player. Not saying that Summitt didn’t do that, but the Huskies are 11-0 in championship games under Auriemma. Four of those wins coming against the Summitt-led Lady Vols. Clearly, Auriemma is at a level even beyond Rocky Top’s favorite coach.
Odom: I have the utmost respect for Geno Auriemma and what he has done as the head coach of Connecticut. However, I have to disagree here. Not only does Summitt still have over 100 more wins than Geno — four seasons after she stepped down from her head coaching position — but she made Tennessee Lady Vol basketball dominant year after year for nearly 40 seasons. Think about that. She led Tennessee to 36 consecutive 20-win seasons, by far the most in NCAA history. Her legacy is still above Geno’s, although the gap is closing quickly.
Bradford: Legacy wise, I’ll give you that, but if we’re talking about strictly coaching greatness, then it’s important to note what Auriemma was walking into when he took the UConn job in 1985. Before his arrival, the program won 36 percent of its games and only once had a winning season. After Auriemma methodically built the program up, the Huskies have a resumé in 20 years that trumps Summitt’s 40 years. Since 1994, UConn has 16 Final Four appearances (Lady Vols have 18 all time). UConn failed to reach the Elite Eight only twice, it had a record-setting winning streak of 90 games and has a current winning streak of 75 games. The Huskies have gone undefeated six times. Tennessee did have the three-peat from 1996-1998, but the Huskies have two three-peats, including an unprecedented four-peat. Auriemma has done more in less time than Summitt, and if you give him a few more seasons, he’ll surpass Summitt’s win total and Final Four total.
Odom: The only thing is, David, legacy is the crucial point in debating which coaches are among the greatest of all time. As stated, I have tremendous respect for what Auriemma has done, but Summitt’s legacy still trumps his. She had to build the Tennessee program into greatness over perennial powerhouses like Louisiana Tech, Old Dominion and Stanford. Not only that, but the SEC used to produce major championship threats every year that Summitt’s teams had to beat multiple times. Auriemma hasn’t had to deal with that competition every year. After all of that, she still led Tennessee to 21 No. 1 NCAA Tournament seeds (the most all-time).
Bradford: I disagree that Auriemma hasn’t had to deal with the same competition. It isn’t UConn’s fault they were moved to the AAC from the Big East, where they had to beat powerhouse programs such as Notre Dame and Louisville on a consistent basis. Just look at their schedule from this past season. They beat Ohio State, Maryland, Notre Dame and South Carolina all by double digits. But what we both can agree on is that Auriemma and Summitt are the top two coaches and there isn’t a right or wrong choice.
Featured image by Ryan McGill
Edited by Cody McClure
Follow me @DavidJBradford1 on Twitter, email me at dbradfo2@vols.utk.edu for any questions.
LEGACY goes far deeper than the number of wins each of them have. Geno will NEVER be the legacy that Pat Summitt IS and always will be. I don’t care how many wins any other coach gets under her or his belt.
NOBODY will ever come close to being a Pat Summitt, but certainly not that guy. He will never admit it, but he learned from Coach Summitt… Another reason he should but will never thank her. She did immeasurable, positive things for the women’s game AND the UConn head coach. He would be lying if he said anything otherwise.
It is NOT “only a debate in Tennessee”. I am from and live in Arkansas. I have many friends who agree with me on this debate and they are from all over the country. In fact, I only have 2 of many, many friends from Tennessee (Memphis) who agree with me. Yes, UConn is a number one powerhouse with an extremely talented coach and he is great at recruiting, as their dominance does the recruiting, even though his (past) recruiting practices were questionable, at the very least. UConn and will continue to be dominant for a while; perhaps for decades. However, HE will never be a Pat Summitt and lead the fight for women’s basketball (and therefore, women’s sports) and make it into what it has become. Without PAT SUMMITT, less people would know or care about the UConn head basketball coach. He should THANK HER, but I’m betting he never has and never will.
NEVER will that guy or any other person surpass Pat Summitt in what she has done for the women’s game of basketball and women’s sports. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE.
Geno has *already* surpassed Pat in NCAA wins. She had 175 under the old AIAW. 150 of those were when the women’s game consisted of 6 per side, with offensive and defensive players not crossing the half court line.That wasn’t just a different era under different sanctioning, it was a different game.
This is only a debate in Tennessee. Geno has surpassed or will surpass anything Pat has done. Plus head to head he owned her.
I’m in agreement with Bradford on this issue. As far as Odom’s point; ” However, I have to disagree here. Not only does Summitt still have over 100 more wins than Geno — four seasons after she stepped down from her head coaching position — but she made Tennessee Lady Vol basketball dominant year after year for nearly 40 seasons.” You answered your own point, Pat has over 100 more wins because she has coached for 38 years, where Geno just completed 31 years. Geno has 955 wins in 31 years (avg 30.8/yr)…Pat has the 1,098 wins (avg 28.9/yr)…at this pace Geno would reach the 1,098 wins in 4.6 years, in his 35.6 years of coaching.