Ethanol is insufficient fuel source
TNJN/Siegert, Anne-Claire
A UT student pumping gas at a local gas station.
published: February 28 2008 08:30 PM updated:: February 28 2008 11:56 PM

On Dec. 19 President Bush signed the public law H.R. 6, the "Energy Independence and Security Act." This law includes a Renewable Fuels Standard, which calls for 36 billion gallons of ethanol to be combined with gasoline nationwide by 2022.  

At its most basic form, ethanol is grain alcohol, also known as gasohol, created primarily from corn. It's then combined with gasoline to produce a fuel that emits lower amounts of carbon into the atmosphere. 

Ethanol appears to be a promising solution; one that marries the desire to lower America's dependence on foreign energy sources with the increasing desire to improve the environment and lower emissions. It's an alternative fuel source that provides economic gain to Midwestern corn farmers and musters feelings of returning to some more organic roots.

According to The Renewable Energy Policy Project study in 2005, the ethanol industry boosted household income by $5.7 billion by creating 154,000 jobs.

All of this, coupled with pictures of corn stalks, swaying, back lighted, by a beatific blue sky, makes ethanol sound, look, and even feel like a good idea. But like so many things in this world, it is not as it seems.

Politicians and lobbyists are touting ethanol around as an alternative fuel solution while providing the public with pretty pictures of pristine blue skies that promise better days. But it can't deliver. According to the Department of Energy, the United States uses 178 billion gallons of gas a day. That means we put out a lot of emissions. But, the process of creating ethanol also emits a lot of pollutants into the air.

According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency, tests by state regulators and the federal agency at ethanol plants found emissions of volatile organic compounds and carbon monoxide -- emissions the plants excused with a plea of ignorance.

And not only are ethanol plants facing scrutiny for the emissions they put out, but also for the land they are clearing in order to grow corn. Despite the growing demand, farmers still have to allow their land to lay fallow. Forests need to be cleared to meet this need. 

This happened in 2006 when land in Singapore was set on fire in order to clear for oil palms intended to supply ethanol plants. While this ridded the land of its ecological value, it also released more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as trees burned. 

Because the demand for ethanol has been set by the RFS as 36 billion barrels by 2022, more and more corn will need to be created in a counterproductive process that emits volatile organic compounds and carbon monoxide. The process of creating this "alternative fuel" actually pollutes the atmosphere.

And not only that, but as the ethanol industry continues to grow, land will need to be cleared; not only destroying the ecological value that ethanol is promising to protect, but also emitting carbon dioxide into that same air it is claiming to leave unaffected.

Politicians and lobbyists are touting ethanol around as an alternative fuel solution while providing the public with pretty pictures of pristine blue skies that promise better days. But it can't deliver. 

It's just another stupid solution that neglects the ever-decreasing beauty of our landscape.  It pollutes the increasingly polluted air we daily choke down. Really, the only positive that it presents is an economic gain for farmers domestically.

But even as we choke down our lesson in valuing economic gain over quality of life, we're making the same stupid mistake. 

Editor: Bridget Hardy

Comments

#1

layman commented, on February 28, 2008 at 11:06 p.m.:

The paragraph on Singapore setting land on fire in 2006 is a factual error. You might have meant Indonesia or Malaysia. Singapore has no such plantations.

Kindly be responsible to your readers and don't mislead or misinform them. Thanks.

#2

jkb commented, on February 28, 2008 at 11:09 p.m.:

Also, if we took our entire corn production and turned it into ethanol it would be a tiny percentage of our energy needs. We do need energy alternatives but not enthanol.

#3

Patrick Beeson commented, on February 29, 2008 at 7:39 a.m.:

The effect of farmers choosing ethanol over grains and other food sources has already contributed to the rising costs of staples such as bread.

This is similar to what's happening to the beer industry. Farmers there are choosing more lucrative crops over hops -- a fundamental element in beer production -- that is in turn boosting the price of a six-pack.

#4

Robbin commented, on March 20, 2008 at 1:39 p.m.:

Can you give any factual information where here in the U.S. forest land has been cleared for corn crops? This type of comparison to other areas of the world is a scare tactic that needs real information to back it up. Corn ethanol has its place but it is supplemental and will not likely expand too much more. Cellulosic ethanol will have a place and it is here already with the use of wood chips and saw dust. No, this will not mean clearing of forests. And have you been to an ethanol plant? Hardly the vision of creating pollution. Yes, there is pollution w/transportation but isn't there also pollution with transportiong petroleum? Let's start comparing apples to apples.

#5

egs commented, on March 24, 2008 at 9:08 a.m.:

Actually Robbin, energy must be input to get energy output from ethanol, ethanol is extremely inefficient in regards to the energy yielded and a significant loss of energy (where do you think the energy input comes from, and what do you think it causes, newsflash, pollution, whether you use coal or oil, etc you are still inputting some form of pollution producing energy source) takes place in the process. Forests may not have been cleared in the US as of now, but as ethanol usage increases it must come from somewhere, corn, lots and lots of corn, more corn than is currently being farmed, which would result in clearing of land, it's common sense. In addition, ethanol reduces gas mileage because of the decreased energy output and as a result more gasoline is used than previously required once again due to inefficiency and the energy put in to get energy out. Not to mention ethanol is clearly expanding more as evidenced by the massive expansion in new ethanol plant projects across the US. The technology and motives are busted, which results in more pollution due to inefficiencies and actually solves no answers other than a fatter paycheck for the US government and farmers, yet people are afraid to bash it because it is "Born in the USA."

#6

Alix commented, on April 10, 2008 at 1:43 p.m.:

i love corn!!!!!!!

Ad
About| Archives| Contact| Courses| Staff| Search